On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:19:50PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that > > fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging > > group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the > > body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely > > packaging, and in that situation it seems odd to restrict membership to > > a subset of the people under fesco's pervue. > > > > There's a few things we can do here. We can keep the status quo. We can > > add new groups such as qa. Or we can open it to the entire project and > > just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate > > gets elected. > > > > Anyone have opinions on what we should be doing here? > > Sounds reasonable to me, is changes to FESCo something that needs to > be approved by the Board? (adding f-a-b mailing list for > clarification). > Which option sounds reasonable? ;-) Traditionally, Board approval is not needed here and I don't think I personally would want to see that change at this point in time (not broke, don't fix). -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpZ6lPD8URAc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
