Florian Müllner <fmuellner <at> gnome.org> writes: Rebuttal only here. No new material. > Does that mean that the existence of terminal emulators for X11 is proof > of graphical user interfaces being a mistake? Terminal and (I guess other) GUI apps do entirely _different_ things. Apps menu in overview and apps menu in normal view do the _same_ thing. > Really, all those extensions proof is that *some* people prefer (parts > of) the old interface, and cared enough to implement it as extensions. > Good for them! It actually proves that some people were willing to put an effort into _duplicating_ the functionality already present in overview, because they found that going into overview involves _unnecessary_ steps. > But implying that users who don't use any of those > extensions are either insane or don't exist is a stretch at best, if not > plain rude. I did not imply that users that use gnome-shell as is are insane. What I said was that GUI behaviour that introduces many _unnecessary_ steps for _no_ _benefit_ is insane. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
