Re: Upgrading libpng: shall we move to 1.4.x or 1.5.x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> FYI, Gentoo already went to libpng 1.5 and so have patches floating around
> for a lot of stuff that breaks.

from a _quick_ search:

http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=libpng&baseproject=openSUSE%3AFactory&lang=en&exclude_debug=true
suse		1.4.x/1.2.x stable - 1.5.x factory

ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware-current/ChangeLog.txt
ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware-13.37/ChangeLog.txt
slackware	1.4.x/1.2.x stable

http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libpng
arch		1.4.x stable

http://packages.gentoo.org/package/media-libs/libpng
gentoo		1.5.x stable

http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/mandriva.com/devel/2012/SRPMS/main/release/
http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/mirrors/Mageia/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/
mandriva	1.2.x stable - 1.5.x devel
mageia		1.2.x stable - 1.5.x devel
pclinux		1.2.x stable

http://packages.debian.org/libpng
http://packages.ubuntu.com/libpng
debian		1.2.x stable - 1.5.x experimental 
ubuntu		1.2.x stable
mint 		1.2.x stable
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux