On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas: >> I guess the directory /usr/share/icons/hicolor and the usual >> subdirectories should be owned by the filesystem package. >> >> Regards >> Till > > hicolor-icon-theme is a filesystem package. Apart from a README, a > COPYING, a Changelog and one %ghost it contains one (1) file. > > And 340 directories. > > This is the filesystem package that packages that install icons are > supposed to depend on. > > Mattias That's the answer I needed. Thank you. IMO, this is not clear in the current packaging guidelines. In fact, the icon cache section says: "Note that no dependencies should be added for this." It appears that it is actually talking about not depending on gtk2 or /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache, but that is confusing the issue of depending on hicolor-icon-theme. Could the packaging committee please clarify this issue? Thanks, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
