Re: Owning /usr/share/icons/hicolor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mån 2011-10-31 klockan 19:02 +0100 skrev Till Maas:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> 
> > Are the fedora-logos and setroubleshoot packages doing it the right
> > way, and other icon-installing packages need to be fixed?  Are they
> > doing it the wrong way, and should be fixed themselves?  Does
> > ownership of that directory depend on some other feature of the
> > package?
> 
> I guess the directory /usr/share/icons/hicolor and the usual
> subdirectories should be owned by the filesystem package.
> 
> Regards
> Till

hicolor-icon-theme is a filesystem package. Apart from a README, a
COPYING, a Changelog and one %ghost it contains one (1) file.

And 340 directories.

This is the filesystem package that packages that install icons are
supposed to depend on.

	Mattias

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux