Re: Reviews done, approval pending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:39:56AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > ndjbdns -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
> >
> > Could someone approve these packages please?
> 
> As for ndjbdns, I'm not quite comfortable with that one. Although I
> hate to mention it because it looks like so much work has already been
> done, I will make one recommendation for it. You probably need to
> create systemd unit files for the tools since it is the default as of
> F15. You can use some %if logic in the spec to use one spec file for
> all releases, i.e.: "%if 0%{?fedora} > 14 ..."

  Additionaly, I believe daemontools feature are subset of systemd's one.
So daemontools shouldn't be needed at all.

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx    in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux