On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Besides this, one may have the opinion, that no binaries should be > allowed in /usr/lib/. Fedora never enforced this rule, because RH has a > tradition of being sloppy wrt. /usr/lib/<package>. One may also have the opinion that you voiced your anti-RH attitude often enough. Seriously, anyone reading this list already knows that if a guy from Red Hat does something, whatever it may be, you are against it. So, your general disagreemeent with anything Red Hat being a well-established fact (I would even say axiom), you can as well save yourself the effort of writing further emails to that end (which will save the rest of the recipients of this list the effort of reading them). That said, I am eagerly awaiting your patches that make libreoffice use FHS instead of placing everything into /usr/lib/libreoffice. The installer is written in perl, so you should not have any problem with it. You may need to change other parts of code as well, but I am prepared to offer suggestions. I am also prepared to help you with getting the patches to upstream. D. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
