On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:30:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: > > On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any > > > package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package. > > > > > > Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined > > > with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably > > > easier to compile every package. > > > > > > Is there a Koji query to get a list of such packages? > > > > which means delay f16, create a stable glibc, test it, then make a > > massrebuild and test again the result... > > > Richard, could you please open a FESCo ticket with as much information > as you have on this issue? This is something we need to track closely, I > think. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
