Re: Another glibc change that nearly got pushed into F16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > 
> > I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
> > package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
> > 
> > Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
> > with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably
> > easier to compile every package.
> > 
> > Is there a Koji query to get a list of such packages?
> 
> which means delay f16, create a stable glibc, test it, then make a
> massrebuild and test again the result...


Richard, could you please open a FESCo ticket with as much information
as you have on this issue? This is something we need to track closely, I
think.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux