Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> FESCo is the entity which can have that conversation with Glibc upstream >> on behalf of Fedora. Who else can? > The Glibc package maintainer. I'm pretty sure he understands > upstream, and FESCo should probably start the discussion with him > first anyway. I'm not exactly sure what glibc "upstream" (defined as people without commit rights to Fedora git) have to do with this at all. The issue AIUI is that unproven glibc changes are getting committed to stable Fedora branches rather than rawhide where they belong. Surely, this is a matter to discuss with the Fedora maintainer(s) of glibc and nobody else. And yes, I think it's about time for FESCo to step in and lay down the law. regards, tom lane
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
