On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'd vote for #1, but that's a much longer conversation that should be >> had upstream and before we even get close to bringing it to FESCo. > > FESCo is the entity which can have that conversation with Glibc upstream > on behalf of Fedora. Who else can? The Glibc package maintainer. I'm pretty sure he understands upstream, and FESCo should probably start the discussion with him first anyway. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
