On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 00:30 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:36:43 +0200, HA (Heiko) wrote: > > > IMHO Rawhide should be the only place where version-control-snapshots > > of such an important component like glibc should be allowed. > > > > Maybe it would be better to let the value of positive karma depend on > > the severity of the package. That would mean that packages like glibc > > would require more positive karma for being pushed to stable than > > packages like gedit. > > Bodhi would need to be changed first. > > So far, what some package maintainers do is to wait for a first +1, then > edit the bodhi ticket to replace the builds, and that doesn't reset the > current karma level to zero. The new builds may be completely broken. I'm not aware of any case of a maintainer doing this intentionally, if that's what you're suggesting. Editing updates with new builds is a reasonably common action and there are perfectly legitimate reasons to do it. I thought the bug where Bodhi doesn't reset karma when you do this was supposed to be getting fixed... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
