Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:36:43 +0200, HA (Heiko) wrote:

> IMHO Rawhide should be the only place where version-control-snapshots
> of such an important component like glibc should be allowed.
> 
> Maybe it would be better to let the value of positive karma depend on
> the severity of the package. That would mean that packages like glibc
> would require more positive karma for being pushed to stable than
> packages like gedit.

Bodhi would need to be changed first. 

So far, what some package maintainers do is to wait for a first +1, then
edit the bodhi ticket to replace the builds, and that doesn't reset the
current karma level to zero. The new builds may be completely broken.

-- 
Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.1.0-0.rc9.git0.0.fc16.x86_64
loadavg: 0.01 0.11 0.13
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux