On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 20:38 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote: > tis 2011-10-11 klockan 10:49 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson: > > > There obviously is a _legitimate_ question as to whether you ought to be > > able to add your package into anyone else's update if you aren't a > > provenpackager; it's not necessarily something we'd want to do. But I > > think provenpackagers probably should be allowed to edit any update. > > I agree that it's probably not desireable to be able to "randomly" add > packages to others updates, but it would be quite nice to link updates > so that when the Firefox update is pushed the update for FF-Extension-X > is also pushed. > > > It does seem to be the case that negative karma is easier to come by > > than positive, yeah. I'm not sure there's much we can do about this > > besides 'game' the rules to account for it, as we're doing already to > > some extent. > > It needs to be a lot easier for people to get notified when there us > updates-testing packages for packages they care about and can help > testing. Much can be done there. Currently the threshold between using > and testing is very very high when in reality it only needs to be one > click away. It's already been pointed out on test list that Bodhi provides RSS feeds you can use for this. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel