On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:05:28 +0200 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > 3. Can someone (I'm looking at you, QA) make sure all > > extensions are still compatible? > > The problem is that testers seem to ignore test cases provided for > updates, because there is an test case to check for extension > compatibility. Or the testers providing karma don't have the extensions in question installed. Personally, I do use noscript but I grabbed it from addons.mozilla.org and not as a Fedora package. To be honest, I didn't even know that it was packaged. The idea behind karma is to be more sure that an update doesn't horribly break systems with a common configuration. Unfortunately, that also tends to mean that every update isn't tested in every possible configuration. There are only so many people pulling from updates-testing that are willing to provide karma. One (potentially unpopular) option would be to ask the FF maintainers to increase the minimum positive karma for pushing to stable. Since FF is a rather popular package, that is not likely to delay it's updates much but would provide more time for different configurations to be tested before a push to stable. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
