Why fedora have not splitted packages?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
:
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Why fedora have not splitted packages?
From
: "dima" <
dima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:24:57 +0200
List-archive
: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help
>
List-id
: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post
: <
mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>, <
mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
>
Reply-to
:
dima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
Why fedora have not splitted packages? For example in Debian some packages, such as kde-games, kde-network and etc are splitted into small packages. It`s very good idea. End-user may select only needed packages or install virtual global package.
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Why fedora have not splitted packages?
From:
Rex Dieter
Prev by Date:
Re: One update too far - help 2
Next by Date:
postfix bug? kernel bug?
Previous by thread:
One update too far - help 2
Next by thread:
Re: Why fedora have not splitted packages?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Formulas]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel Development]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
