Re: One update too far - help 2

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: One update too far - help 2
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:48:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <v04020a03bd5bcf00a8dc@[192.168.49.19]>
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <v04020a03bd5bcf00a8dc@[192.168.49.19]>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bob Gustafson (bobgus@xxxxxxx) said: 
> That was modprobe that Segv'ed, not mod_ins

Fixed in 3.1-0.pre5.2.

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: One update too far - help 2
  - From: Jeffrey C. Ollie