Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011: > After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity > unless I'm missing something. > > I am still interested. Anyone else? Sorry for taking time to reply, but I had a bit too many things at once sprung up on me So...During FUDCon Milan a few of us decided to do a hackfest session on timlau's FedoraReview tool[1]. It seemed like a good base for a review tool, the basic architecture seemed flexible enough etc. Our latest version is at github[2] as well. Changes from timalu's version: * split checks based on them being general or specific to certain language * dynamic loading - every python file dropped in checks subdir is considered a test module. * fix several problems with running local checks without bug in bugzilla * Cleaups, pep8 applications It would be great to have a way so that everyone can implement checks in their language of choice, but for the time being we did this. Idea is to have each SIG maintain their own checks/templates together with their guidelines. I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first, but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe there are still many of us still interested, just not knowing what exactly we should do next. [1] https://github.com/timlau/FedoraReview [2] https://github.com/sochotnicky/FedoraReview/tree/lang-checks -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
