Re: unison formal review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:50:04PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

> Example: we have unison-2.9-1 package which produces
> unison-2.9-1
> unison28-2.8-2
> unison21-2.1-5
> 
> We want to update unison28, so the next build of unison-2.9-2 produces only:
> unison28-2.8.1-1
> 
> What do you think?

This is too complex and makes automatic mass rebuilds more complicated.

Kind regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux