Re: unison formal review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Anyone want to review this one: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
> 
> I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update.

Questions ...

Are we going to obsolete these packages:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison

Instead of introducing yet another variation, can we somehow create a
single 'unison' package which covers all of the protocol variants?

Adding a new package every time upstream has a slight wobble over the
Unison protocol just seems wrong to me, and I'm sure there's got to be
a better way to package this.

Did you look at what Debian are doing?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux