On 09/22/2011 11:31 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 09/22/2011 12:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 09/20/2011 01:12 PM, Branched Report wrote: >>> Compose started at Tue Sep 20 08:15:41 UTC 2011 >>> >>> Broken deps for x86_64 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This breakage is weird: >> >>> hosts3d-1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libglfw.so.2.6()(64bit) >> >> In Fedora< 16, libglfw was provided by libglfw. >> >> In git, >> * hosts3d is marked "dead.package" on master and has >> branches for Fedora< f17. >> * libglfw is marked "dead.package" on master and has >> branches for Fedora< f16. >> Besides this, libglfw is in non-buildable/broken shape for f15. >> >> Note: There is _no_ branch for libglfw/f16 !!! >> >> >> Inside of the rpm repositories, >> * there are host3d packages for both rawhide and f16. >> * there are _no_ libglfw package for neither rawhide or f16. >> >> => The rpm repositories and git are in inconsistent shape. >> >> How do we want to get out of this mess? > > Depends on how you want to resolve this. If you are going for > resurrecting the packages, then fix them up to build again and submit > new package review requests. > > If you want to finish removing host3d, then there are two more steps to do: > - retire host3d F16 branch in pkgdb > - file a ticket with the rel-eng trac to have host3d blocked in koji > for F16+ > > Blocking it in koji will get rid of the rpms in the rpm repos. > > See the Package End of Life instructions at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife > > That doesn't work for provenpackagers. Packages can't be removed without retiring package by package maintainer. -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
