On 9/20/11 10:13 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 09/20/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> I'd like to see a rationale for jamming a soname-changing update into >> the OS so close to a release. > Maintainers on vacation, non-trivial changes? > > In my case, a major change was introduced into rawhide many weeks ago, > which had caused breakage in rawhide. One maintainer being involved was > in vacation, another one was non-responsive. That sounds like the kind of upheaval I'd want to keep out of a release that's in its stabilization phase. > Ca. 4 weeks later the issues were resolved in rawhide and we started to > propagate these changes to f16 and where caught by the delay queues. Of course, you had the option of not pulling the new OpenSceneGraph back to F16, or simply not doing so yet. Particularly during a phase where people are trying to keep change to a minimum so we know what we're working with. I'm sorry that you don't understand release engineering, but since you insist on not understanding it I don't really have any sympathy for your packages being so visibly at fault for breakages. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
