On 19 September 2011 01:46, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, looks like we also need a rebuild of PackageKit-zif against the new > soname (libzif.so.3, the package in F15 is built against libzif.so.2), so I > think the repo is the best solution if we want people to be able to test > this. Richard, what do you think? This is why I didn't backport the new zif to F15. If you're confident doing the PK and zif rebuild for F15 at the same time then I'm happy just to stick it in F15 properly rather than having a separate repo. I didn't trust myself enough to not break PK in a stable release, although it would only affect people with PackageKit-zif already installed. I'm okay with either solution. Thanks. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
