Re: [systemd-devel] question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 09:05 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> and force
> a switch to systemd at the same time and then force the users to
> upgrade again to F16 as soon as possible to get systemd updated
> is simply the wrong way 

I agree! 

other piece of email :
> And FYI to all those that gloriously want to upgrade and claim that
it's
> bug free or "they" ( all of what two people ) not encountered any
issues 
> inetd-style socket activation is borked in .35 ( users need to
downgrade 
> to .34 or add StandardOutput=socket if they cant wait until 36 goes
out )."

So Fedora 15, should go to systemd .34 . 
Put in updates-testing, do some testing and push to updates. 

EOL of Fedora 15 is more than 6 months, and shouldn't have a beta
release of systemd, if systemd enter in a early stage in Fedora 15 ,
should be upgradeable ... ( I think). So what is the point in have a
early stage of a software, if we don't update with bug fixes and
features done. 


Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux