On 09/14/2011 06:47 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > Good points - up to a point - but lets go slow and think for a few > minutes - unlike the kernel which is very hardware dependent and > therefore may run on many machines but not all, systemd is no - or > should not be for its core functionality. Its a piece of software that > should run exactly the same way for all hardware - this is certainly > true for its core functionality - it does indeed take on additional > roles and I have not looked at the source code to see how well / > robustly it handles exceptions ... The chances of it failing for a > subset of users after being decently tested is way lower than for > kernel code You may very well be right but there is a very high risk involved if it fails for say 5% of the users. I don't see anything in the newer version that justifies taking that risk overriding the upstream developers judgement. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
