On 09/12/2011 10:17 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Sure, we need QA, but for rawhide the development shouldn't be totally > stalled as it is already in F16 right now, where updates for critpath > packages, even when they have several hundred thousands of tests > performed already during package building, just sit in bodhi for 2-3 weeks, > often with first proventester karma after 12 or 14 days. > > Jakub I think I used too much hyperbole in my original rant on this subject. We certainly don't want rawhide packages to sit anywhere for a period of time. We just want some system that assures us that the package got some kind of testing before it was released to rawhide. And not every package--just the critical core packages (what those are would be another long thread). For 99% of the packages, I am sure they have been tested by the developer/maintainer. It is the package that just doesn't work that causes the angst, when a simple install or update and run would have shown a problem. Anyway, the problem as it relates to rawhide is really too small to spend any more energy on. -- Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
