On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:09 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > It is also in bugzilla, just not in > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730856 > > but in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732857 > > which has been marked as duplicate of that. > > There should have been a comment pointing out this important information > by the person who added the duplicate. You seem to want everything handed to you on a plate. To me, it doesn't seem unreasonable to expect a maintainer of a key distro component - moreover, one who's being *paid* to do that job - to do just a bit of research on a bug. It took me all of about fifteen minutes to find all the reports and info so far discussed, and I'm _not_ being paid to maintain gedit. You say that I should have posted some things to the bug report and not a mailing list thread...yet you seem to respond to devel list threads rather more frequently than you respond to bug reports. I note that you _still_ haven't actually responded to this bug report: to anyone not following this thread it still looks like the bug has been entirely neglected for nearly a month. In contrast, you replied to my devel list thread within a day. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
