> And unless your someone from @redhat.com, not sure there is anything you > need to be telling him what he can/can't do on their own mailing lists > (unless we are talking spamming it, abusing or that type thing), whether > it's useful (to you?) or not. > > Besides, maybe the bug # was posted to @redhat.com folks or someone > already know of it from Red Hat and he was just posting what is already > known. I've got to agree with Seth there. My job at Red Hat has nothing to do with development and I have no special access to anything to do with Fedora. Jeff, though I wish he'd been more polite about it, was correct in that I should have checked to see if there had been any more news (sure enough, the bug still exists in mdk10). That said, this thread is getting focused on a relatively unimportant part of my post (IMO) and ignoring where I *was* trying to "move the discussion forward" To wit: > a) Is a fix being developed (by whom? if not, who wants it?) > > b) Once it's developed, can we replace the FC2 ISOs on the website and > mirrors with ones that incorporate the fix? My incorrect assertion that we were the only ones with this problem aside, I fail to see how asking these (still unanswered) questions fail to move the discussion forward. --Brad
