On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:40AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > That may be (both are human constructs, it's like say "hey, that's made up > word!", but no, I don't. My point is simply that while it is extremely > silly code, it is in fact code provided by upstream. It's still > maintained, is of a valid license, and I don't see a valid reason to break > with upstream here. If you can convince upstream to split it out or drop > it, great. That's simple, I'm upstream maintainer. The command has been disabled by default in the last stable release. And yes, one I day I'll drop it... > If not, and there isn't a compelling disk space or security > argument, I really don't see why this should be dropped. I'm looking for > a clear example of demonstrable harm. It's 14k of silliness, not a > rootkit. - it's joke rather than anything useful - it's installed on all systems, but almost nobody uses this crap Karel -- Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx> http://karelzak.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
