On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 19:44 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 24.08.11 10:56, Simo Sorce (simo@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > a random connection. There many reasons why you may have stopped the db > > > > (or it may have stopped itself) and requires inspection before > > > > attempting a new restart. Having to battle with socket activation while > > > > in a critical situation is not a good idea. > > > > > > You'd have the same problem with any init system that supports automatic > > > service restarting. You can easily disable the service via systemctl. > > > > You can do that if you are doing a planned outage. But not for unplanned > > ones. > > > > I am not saying automatic restarts should never be employed, only that > > not all software should be automatically restarted. I think databases > > shouldn't in most cases. But that's just my opinion on the specific > > case. That doesn't mean socket-activation shouldn't be employed in other > > cases. > > Restart= defaults to off by default, since only selected services should > be restarted automatically. > > What currently is missing is that if a service fails we can (optionally) > automatically propagate this to the triggering .socket, .path, .timer > units. That's what you are asking for right? Because in that case we > would shut down a listening socket as soon as the backing service > fails. This has been on the TODO list for a while I just need to get > around implementing this. Yes, I think this would neatly solve many issues. Thanks, Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel