Lennart Poettering (mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Oh, I just noticed this: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemd#Socket_activation > > "Since Fedora currently doesn't want any services to do on-demand > > loading, all socket activated services must autostart." > > Uh, oh. I think CUPS is definitely something we should lazily socket > activate instead of run it unconditionally. > > Spot, Bill, what's the reason for this wording in the guidelines? As > CUPS is something we really should start only when needed, why do we > have this wording in the guidelines? Can we relax this? I'm trying to remember. Perhaps it stemmed from the side consequence of needing to know if a particular service had a socket entry, and therefore you needed to disable both to disable a service? (I do recall there being issues with socket-activated NetworkManager for reasons along these lines.) For something like cups, would this impose a significant delay in things such as the GTK or QT print dialog, if opening that dialog causes the cups daemon to then start? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
