We should also target and package a clearly stated and defined (features) version of the compiler, that has been tested and validated. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 > Björn Persson <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Ilyes Gouta wrote: >> > I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. >> >> According to PathScale's license document their products are partly >> free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free >> parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts? >> >> Björn Persson > > http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement > June 13th, 2011 > > "PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now > available as an open source project and free download for Linux, > FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the > complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler, > runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of > ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest > performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers." > > > The sources seem to be available at > https://github.com/path64 > > The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the > compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the > build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was > on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to > build. > -- > Jussi Lehtola > Fedora Project Contributor > jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
