On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 19:40 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > I've never got around to working up a coherent proposed modification and > > submitting it, though - if anyone else can, that'd be great. > > I'll just go back to what I've said before. I don't care what system > you create as long as there is something/someone responsible and > accountable for getting things unblocked. Right now there is no > one/thing responsible and accountable for getting things approved and > you nag the one person who doesn't have the ability to do it. That's > just flat backwards. I'm not sure what kind of a 'you' that was, but it ain't my job, mate ;) - FESCo came up with the current update approval process. Anyone can propose a change to it, you have as much standing as me (if not more) to do that. FESCo would have to discuss and approve it. The reason why the package maintainer gets nagged has been explained several times: part of the theory behind the current process is that it is, to some extent, your responsibility as a package maintainer to ensure your package gets tested. You can't perform the testing, but it's reasonably likely that you would be (or, at least, *could* be) in touch with people who could, and could contact them and encourage them to do the testing. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
