Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> See attached. > Looks fine to me. The only reason I have to dislike it is the > temptation for people to inspect build logs as a proof of what flags a > package was built with (since the only sane thing is to store that in > the binary itself, which the tools team is working on). But for > debugging build failures this is great. What happens in packages using a (possibly old) autoconf script that doesn't recognize --disable-silent-rules? IMO it would be better to add this option to the %configure calls in packages where it's actually an issue (which is surely a small minority, unless Colin has got evidence to the contrary). regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
