On Wed, 27.07.11 16:56, James Antill (james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > It looks more like the first victim of systemd using cgroups as a > > > replacement for setsid() etc. ... pam_systemd being the first return > > > volley in that war. *sigh*. > > > > systemd is not using cgroups as replacement for setsid(). > > And then you go on to explain how pam_systemd is required so that it > can do the setsid() like "remove me from the session" call ... and thus. > not get hit with the kill() sent to the previous session. > I'm not saying that cgroups doesn't do _other_ things as well ... but > using it as a shiner setsid() is just doomed to a war where everyone > puts "cgroup calls" where setsid() calls currently are. setsid() is primarily a call to implement job control in shells. systemd is not involved in job control in shells. Never has, never will be. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
