On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 03:24:58 PM Jesse Keating wrote: > On 7/26/11 1:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Yes, It got untagged. See last week's thread on this list: > > Subject: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) > > found" > > I thought there was a hard rule about not having nvrs go backwards, and > if a bad build was put out, it should be fixed with epoch or other such > NVR things to make sure the upgrade path continues. (that is once a > build makes it out in the nightly repos) I untagged the rpm build and we do have that rule, I could have sworn that it had only been built that day and not made it into rawhide. if i had realised that it had made it to rawhide i would have bumped the epoch on the old build to ensure that updating was correctly handled. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
