On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 18.07.11 23:26, Miloslav Trmač (mitr@xxxxxxxx) wrote: >> I can't see a reason to discuss /etc/sysconfig as a single unit, nor >> to argue for removal of /etc/sysconfig a single unit, nor to try to >> form a definite consensus about /etc/sysconfig. > > Oh, it definitely can be discussed as single unit. Check the Fedora > packaging guidelines: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript <snip> >> * _various_ software: Each file needs to be discussed separately, in >> the context of the software that uses it. >> /etc/sysconfig/{crond,iptables,nspluginwrapper} have nothing in >> common, and need to be considered separately together with the >> software that uses these files. > > Nah, not true. The packaging guidelines say explicitly what you should > place in that directory. They only say that SysV scripts should be placed in that directory, not that SysV files are the only, or primary, content. I have already provided a counterexample above. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
