On 7/14/11 10:21 AM, JB wrote: > Josef Bacik <josef <at> toxicpanda.com> writes: > >> ... >> I've already said >> that if it's not in good shape by Alpha the switch won't even be made, >> so quit your bitching. >> >> Josef > > Josef, > would it be possible, BEFORE (in case that) you decide to switch on before > Alpha, to present some test suite results (a la Phoronix, etc) that would > assure yourselves and Fedora testers/users of BTRFS fitness ? Or maybe something which is actually more relevant to filesystem behavior than "mp3 encoding" and "parallel bzip2 compression?" ;) The xfstests test suite is a good general fs regression test, and it's run all the time on btrfs, fwiw. Of course Josef and other filesystem developers run such tests as a matter of course. There seems to be some idea that fs developers are a wild-eyed bunch of hacks who are just itching to lose or corrupt your data. It's not true; filesystem developers are, for the most part, highly conservative with these things. We know the pain we can cause if we get it wrong. > If it came from you it would have a special weight and a sign that you > do no want to sell cats in a bag :-) > > I hope, that the community at large will parallel it with their own tests. Indeed, that would be a lot more useful than random potshots and assertions on mailing lists ;) -Eric > JB > > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel