2011/7/13 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
You might have said the same thing about ext4 in F<whatever it was>On 7/13/11 4:55 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 13.07.2011 23:51, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>>> So there's my long ass explanation of why VMs on Btrfs suck. I'm
>>> sorry, I'm aware of the problem and I'm trying to fix it, but it's a
>>> slow going process.
>>
>> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
>> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17
>
> +1
>
> bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
> unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
> existing and over a long time well working things - never!
and yet, here we are, shipping it as default for many releases now, with
little trouble.
Not every big change to Fedora breaks badly, although I can see how some
might get that impression. ;)
-Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Josef Couldn't say it better:
Let's not be dramatic... I'm pretty sure Fedora Developers are not going to
make the Switch to BTRFS in F16 if it's not ready, that's why I sen't my feedback
and little investigation, in order to help them track down the issues before anything
gets released, that's why we work as community and I'm pretty sure that everything is
gonna be Okey.
P.S. Now I'm in ext4, almost finished reinstalling my system ;)
--
Manuel Escudero
PGP/GnuPG: E2F5 12FA E1C3 FA58 CF15 8481 B77B 00CA C1E1 0FA7
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
