Re: Deprecating portreserve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/11/2011 03:08 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> The BMC thing sounds a bit more special-purpose than portreserve, and
> presumably could be done in its own package that could perhaps be
> installed as needed depending on the hardware.
>
> So is the next step to deprecate portreserve?  What actually needs to be
> done for that to happen?
>

I guess figure out what requires portreserve and ping those ?

JBG
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux