Hi, W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał: > ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all of > them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to > reproduce original problem nor valgrind complaint, so please test if > following package produces memcpy complain in valgrind output or not: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mhlavink/task_3190860/ Your mtab handling patch fixed both issues - mount warning and data corruption :) Huge thanks! > > Anyway, I don't think there is any problem in ecryptfs-utils, because it's > just mount helper. It's not running when files are being encrypted/decrypted > and you said it works fine when you use ecryptfs directly (without samba). > We've fixed memcpy bug in ecryptfs which is definitely a good think, but > problem is elsewhere. > > If you want, you can test following build of samba which has all occurrences > of memcpy replaced by memmove. I don't dare to guess if it changes anything, > but give it a try if you want: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mhlavink/task_3190918/ > > Could you describe your environment in more details so we can try to > reproduce it? For example what ecryptfs options you use (including fstab > line if you have any), samba configuration etc... I do not think that it had any significance - it seems to me that these options are pretty standard mount -t ecryptfs /home/$SHARE/ /home/$SHARE/ -o key=passphrase,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16,ecryptfs_passthrough=n,ecryptfs_fnek_sig=some_value It's a little strange that you could not reproduce that mount warning. > > Michal > > -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
