Re: vsftpd in the news

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 23:27 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 10:53 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > It would be nice if we could upload/commit the .asc or .sig file, and have the rpmbuild script
> > automatically check the tar ball.
> 
> Hm, yes. It would be nice to see Koji support checking source sigs. OBS 
> already does so. Seeing as Debian has done this for years with the 
> source .deb including a signature file, RPM >4.9 could support sigs for 
> the Source0 file.

Making Source0 a special case sounds rather dirty to me, if at all such
functionality should be available for all source files (and patches
eventually).

Furthermore, just having a signature file doesn't help a bit if you
can't be sure who created the signature... and I suspect if we were to
restrict ourselves to upstream packages that a) have gpg signatures b)
from keypairs not more than a certain "distance" (web-of-trust-wise)
away from a known good keypair, we'd be able to trim down the package
repositories substantially ;-). So for the time being I guess we should
stick with letting package maintainers check this (of there is anything
to check).

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux