On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:56:00 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To add something actually constructive... someone could propose that > services which don't have systemd unit files don't ship for F16 > (Probably as part of the > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd ) > > That is an idea that has pros and cons. The major pros are that it > means that users will have a more consistent experience with > reconfiguring the on/off state of their services and we'll be forcing > people to add systemd unit files rather than just letting proposed > changes just sit around in bugs. > > The cons are that we may lose some services for F16 because the > services aren't ported by the F16 deadline. However, they could be > brought back after F16 is released so that's not a huge con. We'd > need to make sure that the "essential" services are ported over, but > IIRC, that's already the plan for the alpha release. Sure. I would say that would be a ticket filed with FESCo for that. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
