Re: systemd: please stop trying to take over the world :)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 13.06.11 19:02, Denys Vlasenko (dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:37 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 18:01 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > > We invoke sethostname() from inside systemd since that is one of the
> > > > most trivial system calls known to men and doing this with a
> > > separate
> > > > binary is just absurd. This way we also can ensure that the hostname
> > > is
> > > > always initialised which is very useful for early boot logging and
> > > other
> > > > stuff. On systemd you get the guarantee that the hostname is always
> > > set
> > > > up if you run in userspace,
> > > 
> > > You can't possibly know what kind of (possibly dynamic) hostname
> > > admin might want to assign to his machine. The static hostname
> > > may be as useless as default "(none)" which is set by kernel.
> > > Anyway, logging with default hostname is not a catastrophe.
> > > 
> > > Why do you set up stuff no one asked you to?
> > 
> > Changing a machine hostname at random times is just asking for trouble.
> 
> I just tried it. So far flames don't shoot out of my notebook.

Wow, that's convincing proof.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux