Re:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/6/11 Miloslav TrmaÄ <mitr@xxxxxxxx>:
> Hello,
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install"
> <snip>
>> configure:3659: gcc  -no-install conftest.c Â>&5
>> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
>
>> Do you have any idea?
>
> -no-install, which the command explicitly includes, is a libtool
> option, but not a valid gcc option. ÂI don't know why it is necessary
> to use -no-install, but if you do need it, you can probably patch
> Makefile* to include it in such a way that the operation of
> ./configure is not disrupted.
> Â ÂMirek
> --

I've found an example here:

It's useful if someone wants to avoid the wrappers generation (look at the end):

http://www.flameeyes.eu/autotools-mythbuster/libtool/wrappers.html

Perhaps ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install" is somewhat "heterodox" ....

-- 
--
Sergio Belkin Âhttp://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux