On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:34:40PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 06/03/2011 05:52 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > Anyway, I'll tell Jeremy he'll need to manually remove/update. > > In my opinion this is a good (or bad?) example how users' life is made > harder due to irrational fear of the Epoch. Telling Jeremy won't help > people who don't know that the problem exists or don't follow the bug > report. Caveat: I don't know a thing about hulahop or if using Epoch > with it would be somehow specially problematic, but I'm assuming it > wouldn't be because according to my F-14 repoquery there are only two > packages in Fedora that depend on it, and neither has a versioned > dependency on it. I agree with you but this bug is a bit special in that it is several versions out of date. If this was F14 or even F13, the Epoch bump would be good. But adding a bump for a mistake on a F10 branch seems unnecessary now. Cheers, Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
