On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 03:12:39AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:39:13 +1000 > Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 02:21:14AM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > > However, given that the problematic package only appeared in Fedora > > > 10 and upgrade paths are guaranteed by Fedora policy only from > > > F(N-1) to F(N), I'd say that there's probably no need to fix this > > > any more, since any remaining installations haven't had updates for > > > ages and upgrading to a current release cleanly would require a > > > clean reinstall anyway. > > > > true, but anyone who would have had hulahop installed at F-10 time > > and did the (guaranteed) update to F11, F12, ... F15 at the right > > times would still have this issue now, right? > > > > tbh, it seems to be corner case enough to just say "uninstall and > > re-install" but nonetheless... > > Yes. It's just a bit hard to believe that there would be still a lot of > systems suffering from this, since yum would have complained about the > problem on every update, and you haven't had a single bug report about > the issue in a time period of more than two years..? As stated in the first email, there is a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574484 People (well, at least one person) first complained about it Mach 2010 - no one listened (or did anything about it). Anyway, I'll tell Jeremy he'll need to manually remove/update. Cheers, Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
