On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 13:28, Matthew Miller wrote: > Not to doubt you, but what does "plenty of them" mean? Fedora won't even > install with 32MB, and by the time more RAM than that was common, so were > newer CPUs, if I remember right. A local non-profit computer recycler asked me about using Linux a few months ago. They tell me that the average system they have donated is a Pentium 75 MHz with 64 MB RAM. Some faster, some with more RAM, some with less RAM. They make sure each system has 64 MB when they refurb it. There are a fairly substantial number of old computers being put back into service using either Windows 98 or a Linux distribution. (MS still offers Win98 to non-profit recyclers _very_ cheaply. Cheaply meaning competitive with free.) As I understand it most of these refurb machines are being sent off to governments and schools in South America where they would otherwise be without computers. It would seem shortsighted to ignore them just because they aren't i686. A Pentium is still a powerful machine. Especially when combined with LTSP or some other X terminal arrangement. > I'm very sympathetic to making Linux run on older hardware, but Fedora is > already pretty unfriendly to those systems as is. Why not just make the > Pentium Pro the minimum for FC3? That covers us all the way to back to 1995 It does? What about AMD K6 computers? They are i586 and they are newer than 1995 or 1998. Fedora Core works wonderfully on my 2001 model AMD K6-2 450 MHz laptop with 192 MB RAM. It works wonderfully on my 2000 model AMD 500 MHz K6-2 desktop with 256 MB RAM. If I disable all the services it works well on my Pentium 90 MHz laptop with 48 MB RAM and Pentium 75 MHz desktop with 64 MB RAM. I've experimented with kdrive on FC1 and it drops memory usage to about 20 MB on the Pentium machines. -- David Norris http://www.webaugur.com/dave/ ICQ - 412039
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
