-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 15 May 2004 07:19, Matthew Miller wrote: > I was wondering about this. Is it still the case that i586 performs > _worse_ on non-original-Pentium systems than i386? (Or is that wrong in > the first place, or not relevant to kernels?) Yes, as far as I know. > Which brings up this question: are there any i586 systems out there with > enough RAM to run anaconda anyway? Yes, plenty of them. The base issue is that things like nptl and such aren't available in an i386 kernel anymore, which is what the installer used to use. So the installer has to use the next step up that supports everything needed, which would be i586. Sure they could use i686 and be somwhat faster, but that would leave a lot of people out there unable to install. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFApjod4v2HLvE71NURAs7BAJ41HoMdd94d9ToCW4+H1iCPHFdFagCeNkkC TcTTvYMHL1zrlrC9VQ7Zk4w= =o7IJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
