Am 02.06.2011 16:04, schrieb drago01: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Am 01.06.2011 22:54, schrieb Ville Skyttä: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647 >>> >>> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In >>> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my >>> upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out. >>> >>> Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which >>> default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default >>> there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and base. >>> admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not really >>> an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin >>> activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> PLEASE do not make a basic-install larger with something what maybe for someone >> nice, thats from a user which installs "bash-completion" on each machine after >> setup, there are people out there using other shells and the base-setup has to >> be as small as possible > > That wouldn't be a hard dep you can just uninstall it so PLEASE install a new fedora and remove anything not needed for ssh, rsync, scp and tell me how long it takes to find all of them what you do with such a machine: decide what services you will install on this bare setup or using as it is as backup-host where rsync is enough much of them you can only find with trial and error by look what yum says to a "yum remove" because "package-cleanup --leaves" does not find most things without "lib" in the name and then tell why the count of unneeded base-packages should be increased remember: "base" is defined the absoloutly minimum to boot a system and log in as root!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
